In the scenario where Luciano files Form I-539 to extend his stay, has he established his burden of proof?

The scenario indicates that Luciano has filed Form I-539 to extend his stay, and for him to establish his burden of proof, he must demonstrate that he is eligible for this benefit with appropriate documentation. The correct answer highlights that Luciano provided evidence that supports his eligibility and meets USCIS requirements. This is crucial because the burden of proof lies with the applicant to show that he qualifies for the requested immigration benefit and follows the prescribed process set by USCIS.

In the context of immigration forms and applications, meeting the burden of proof involves submitting necessary and relevant documents that substantiate the claims made in the application. This can include evidence of legal status, supporting documentation for the extension of stay, and any other information required to assess eligibility. Thus, providing comprehensive evidence as indicated in the correct option is essential for a successful application.

Other choices fall short because they either focus on the desire to extend stay without connecting to eligibility proof, mention unrelated documents like a deed to a house, or suggest a lack of sufficient documentation without acknowledging any evidence presented. These aspects do not adequately address the requirement for proving eligibility under the immigration laws governing Form I-539.