Which of the following is an exception to the general admissibility requirements for adjustment under INA § 245(i)?

The exception to the general admissibility requirements for adjustment under INA § 245(i) is rooted in the specific provisions of immigration law that allow certain individuals to adjust their status despite specific grounds of inadmissibility.

INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) pertains to individuals who are considered to be present in the United States without being admitted or paroled. This section allows certain applicants for adjustment of status to apply under the provisions of INA § 245(i) if they meet the conditions, despite their illegal entry.

The importance of this exception lies in the flexibility it offers to those who may otherwise face significant barriers to adjustment due to their unauthorized presence. Essentially, Congress recognized that individuals with specific connections to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents might otherwise face insurmountable obstacles, and thus created exceptions to support family unity and provide pathways to legal status.

In contrast, options related to criminal convictions, certain fraud-related issues, or deportability do not align with the same exceptions afforded under § 245(i), as they involve different statutory grounds that do not provide similar relief mechanisms. Thus, the selection of INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) accurately reflects the special consideration for those who are present